Wednesday, 6 July 2016

Manaiakalani Phone Home

From April to July 2016 I have been fortunate enough to be travelling, learning and enjoying some R & R supported by a Woolf Fisher Fellowship

My next few posts will form a summary of that learning journey as Dorothy and I travelled though Hawai'i, Europe and Nth America.

Thanks Woolf Fisher Trust, for this extraordinary learning experience!

Chapter 1, Hawai’i
Monday 25 April
Visit to Hale Kula Elementary on Schofield Military Base (now known as Daniel Inouye Elementary School)
Principal Jan Iwase


7:30 a.m. Denied access as foreigners with no armed services sponsor onto a US Military Base. We were told very firmly that we were unacceptable in our current state. Brendan, our good friend, guide and organiser no doubt found this frustrating and embarrassing as people were waiting for us in the school, but was carefully compliant and immediately began working on “Plan B”


8:00 a.m. Brendan has Plan B organised for us to visit a school down the road, when Jan, (principal from Hale Kula) calls to say she has a military sponsor for us.


8:30 a.m. we make it onto base after displaying our beautiful NZ passports and from there on it’s like being back in Hawai’i. The manaaki is amazing. Gifts of leis, food, drink, -a really warm welcome.


This school is receiving a $33M property upgrade mostly courtesy of Dept of Defence, after President Obama realised as a result of parent pleas that Base Schools were in an embarrassingly shoddy condition.
The state contributes 20%.


As part of a state initiative these kids all got MacBook Airs 2 years ago.
This school has MLE’s in the new build (if the teachers choose to use them that way) and have blended learning going on although they have 1:1 potential. Their key question for us was ‘how did we get all our teachers onboard?’
As in much of the US they are talking about integration rather than fully digital learning.
The teachers in the MLE’s were taking the option of keeping them closed into cells, (much as our some of own teachers did when we first cut holes through the walls to create more flexible spaces.
Here's Liam proudly showing me the comic he's building in Google Draw.
5 kids came out of class to show us their very cool work.
Like Pt England, these people have lived through construction, noise and dust for the last two years. Working hard with incredibly high turn-over of students because they are a military base school.


Principal Dale was absent but kindly allowed us to come, because of the muck-up at the gates of the base earlier in the morning.
We were hosted by Sean, Kat & Barron, -all VP's


Their annual theme for 2016 is Productive Perseverance.
They have 774 students
Like other schools we visited they got $1M for New tech approx 2 years ago.
Kids all have MacBook Airs. Principal insists they are out and available for kids to use at all times. The school owns the devices and this was the case in all the schools we visited.
They described their position in development as “getting our feet wet with blended learning”.
They used phrases we are familiar with like “working for sticky Learning”.
Some of the classes look like ours in the way they are open, kids are mobile and devices are being used.
They are making a real effort to use digital tools to enhance learning.
Using Lucid for School Newsletters
They have nice youtubes in digital newsletters
They have invented and funded a teaching position called “Learning Innovation Specialist” (we really liked this and thought we might “borrow” it!)
Their focused inquiry question is; “how do you go from good to great?” What a great focus!
They are focusing on building an innovation team
Their Tech Cadre has grade level teacher reps
They have a very nice standardised At a Glance Spreadsheet so everyone can see where kids are up to in their assessments
Very cool school. Inside quite a stark external environment, this is what you find.


IMAG0226.jpg


Principal Lisa Ann Higa
Immersion Unit Leader; Kumu Kai Mana


This is a real decile 1A school or lower. The Nanakuli valley is a Hawai’ian Homestead and many of the homes are significantly underprivileged.
These people are striving to succeed against the odds.
We had lunch with the principal, Lisa and the co-ordinator of the complex or cluster, Terri. We received beautiful lei (we received lei at all the schools) but at this school they were real and very beautiful. Mine was made from the Tea Plant, Dorothy’s was Frangipani. -The real deal.
Lunch was in polystyrene boxes like when you buy Fiafia food, and was real, made on the day Fiafia food. Pulled pork (fresh from the umu/imu) , rice , poe (pulped taro), jelled, chilled coconut creme, banana cake. Wow.
We visited the immersion unit and were greeted beautifully. The teacher, Kai Mana, loved his kids and they loved him (and said so)
There  was some excitement here because these kids had been involved in the Google Hang-Outs around the Mālama Honua Landing at Pt England.
The kids all gave us hugs like at PES and it felt like home.
The population is 100% polynesian and if you stuck red uniforms on them, you would think you were at Pt England.
This was a very heart warming visit. The way the kids behaved and the manāki we received were just lovely.
This school is getting its best success out of its immersion unit and we could see that some of the rest of it was “still under development.”
Lisa has been there 2 years and is clearly doing a turn around job. These Guys received the same New Tech grant as the other 2 schools we visited, so kids all have 11” MacBook Airs.
The kids talked cheerfully about what they were doing and were engaged and confident, but couldn’t necessarily distinguish their learning from their doing. It was clear they were learning though.
The school gardens are pretty cool.
Kaimana and his kids are really keen to have Hang-Outs with our kids.
IMAG0229.jpg


Tuesday 26 April


Contacts
Holoua Stender, Executive Vice President of Education
Phyllis Unebasami, Managing Director, Ho`olaukoa Educational Systems and Strategies
Kamehameha Schools


Kamehameha Schools is in some ways a misleading name in that although this enterprise runs three beautiful K - 12 Campuses, and many pre-schools, it’s actually the name of the Enterprise that holds the land, investments and and businesses that Princess Pauahi left in trust for 5 trustees to administer.


This $11B enterprise has clearly stated purposes:


Purpose

Kamehameha Schools’ endowment exists to support our educational mission to fulfill Pauahi’s desire of creating educational opportunities in perpetuity to improve the capability and well-being of people of Hawaiian ancestry.


Background

Pauahi’s estate encompasses more than 363,000 acres throughout Hawai‘i — approximately 169,000 acres zoned for agriculture, 189,158 acres in conservation, 15,000 acres in commercial and 3,000 residential acres — and generates income to serve more than 48,000 learners and caregivers per year.
All Kamehameha Schools’ land-based and investment decisions are filtered through a set of five core principles — culture, community, education, economics, and environment. This balanced approach to decision-making ensures the perpetuation of Pauahi’s legacy, her lands and the execution of her will.


We had an absolutely delightful breakfast meeting with Phyllis and Holoua in an engagement that was brought about by Prof Michael Fullan, who we also expect to visit on this trip.
We discovered that we have much in common, with real desire to bring about practice change for better outcomes for Polynesian learners and similar but different struggles in trying to bring this about.
KS have a support type relationship with other ‘native schools’ as their trust deed has set the mission stated above. Consequently they have a relationship with Nanakuli (where we were the day before) and it may be that we could have future involvement in their effort to bring greater success and better outcomes to their indigenous population, many of whom suffer significant disparity.
KS are most like our Integrated Schools, but with a far larger endowment.


Phyllis & Holoua.jpeg
The campuses are beautiful and have everything. Like SHC in NZ, the kids get great facilities, good education and only pay $500 p.a. because the endowment supports the cost of education. The Honolulu campus is on a mountainside above the city and enjoys one of the best views in Hawai’i.


The principal, Earl, has just won a position as Superintendent of Stanford School District and Dorothy thinks I should apply for the job here! I think I’d better make sure I get back to Pt England on time!


Kamehameha Schools View.jpgPhyllis is in charge of all the teacher development for KS and this includes their support for Hawai’ian language and culture schools. We are to work out with her, Holoua and Michael Fullan how Manaiakalani might partner with them in the future. There are very real partnership possibilities here.


Our next education visit was to the Marine Education Training Centre on Sand Island.
This is where our friends from Mālama Honua hang out along with their va’a or waka.
Once we signed in, our 1st visit was over the historic vessel Hawai’iloa along with one of the early navigator companions of Nainoa, “Uncle Billy”.
20160427_175339.jpgWe then had the outstanding privilege of a sunset sail on Hikianalia. This more than made up for missing out on sailing on her in the Waitemata last year! How cool to do this off O’ahu in her home harbour.


On the way we learned lots about the va’a from Na’alehu and “Uncle Bob” the navigators, as well as learning about the shoreline and local geographic features. I loved hearing tales of sailing to different tricky destinations like Rapanui & Tahiti.
To say I loved it, is rather mild. Definitely my idea of an extremely great time!


Ke Kula Kaiapuni 'O Ānuenue

Miki Tomita, who spent time at Pt England for the Mālama Honua visit, was our escort for the 2nd day of school visits.
Ānuenue is the equivalent of  a New Zealand Wharekura, i.e. its an immersion school and goes from K-12.
The principal, Glen is a lovely calm elder statesman in the place, where we were shown around by VP Baba.
Their inclusion of traditional crafts, built to honour parents and grandparents, along with their commitment to land and gardening was a real challenge to us.
When it comes to digital pedagogy, we are achieving a great deal, without the $1M grant for technology, most of these folks got.
By and large, our buildings are superior in build quality and design. Something our welfare state and government can be very proud of.
This state has so much money it isn’t funny, but the way property taxes in poor areas have to fund school buildings causes so much inequity.
Never have we seen such run down school facilities in such close proximity (i.e. 3 city blocks) to really rich and fancy ones.
It would be like Pt England built like St. Kentigern College, 4 blocks away from Ruapotaka looking as though it were in Papua New Guinea!
Anuenue Miki, Baba, Glenn, Russell .jpgAnyway, back to Ānuenue, -they are like the days of the early kura movement, making the best of what they have, working in funny old buildings, beautifying the lands around them. Many native Hawai’ians choose to send their kids here and you can see and feel the love all around you.
Like other Hawai’ian schools, the welcome is warm, but in the main the classroom is the domain of the class teacher and people don’t wander in and out like we do.
Pt Englanders will recognise Miki, I’m talking with Glen, Baba waits patiently.


These guys are interested some of our stuff, including the questions we use to run our parent meetings.


Along with other schools we visited, they are also keen to have Google Hang-outs with some of our classes.
Anuenue14 MakerSpace.jpg

All the kids in this class were making different kinds of Mothers’ Day or Grandmothers’ gifts, by tradtional means.



Some were weaving, some were polishing stones, some were sanding and polishing shells.


All of them were to be presented with love to someone special.
Really cool to see.


Like the early days of the kura movement, they have few resources, and a massive problem with assessments not being in the language of instruction.


Like our kura, the kids do poorly in tests till they reach the equivalent of our Y10 and then they just take off and do really well, so the parents have to hold their nerve and not shift them out to mainstream at Y6, (like some of ours do).
And then there’s the gardens………...
Anuenue5 Gardens and Fish Ponds.jpg


Different grade levels are responsible for different parts of the gardening process.


IMAG0257.jpgAfter visiting Ānuenue, Miki handed us off to Tara, (who also visited PES) and we were taken to the College of Ed. at University of Hawai’i. We met quite a few lecturers and noticed they were translating our Sunshine Books into Hawai’ian language for their Kula. So now we have the job of connecting them with Dame Wendy Pye, who owns Sunshine Books and supports Manaiakalani, to see if she would be happy to translate them properly and support their Kula with Sunshine Online.

From there we went on to visit Kaimuku High School where we had another beautiful welcome, were given absolutely gorgeous leis and met more people who watched the Mālama Honua Landing @ Pt England Beach. The kaiako or “kumu” cried when I gave her one of our Hei Matou o Maui, the hooks Donna secured for us from the Carver before we came away. -What a blessing those turned out to be! Hawaiians who received them were particularly moved.


IMAG0265.jpg


We were taken upstairs through the school to hear the va’a talks. We were honoured guests, seated at the front, as proud young Hawaiian kids ran PLD for teachers, telling them how their lives had been changed by sailing on the va’a. Rather like our Ambassadors. Very real and powerful.
Kaimuki HS7.jpgThe two facilitating teachers then encouraged the 60 or so staff present from around Honolulu, to include or integrate the va’a in their teaching, rather like we would experience at PLD on Te Ao Maori.


And that still wasn’t the end of the day!
The day culminated with a Pau Hana at ʻŌiwiTV, where we got to catch up again with Bryson, & Na’alehu our camera man & producer along with Maui the editor, who we’d never met, and a whole bunch of the others.
Dorothy conned Maui to create the Manaiakalani (starline) opener for the Manaiakalani Film Festival this year. -Good score! His work is beautiful!







Our good friend and fellow Googler Brendan Brennan, who put together much of this itinerary for us, works here at this school as a Maths Teacher.
The morning we visited, he was courageously 360º live-streaming his maths teaching and his learners’ responses. -Way to go Brendan!Brendan's class.jpg


The school was founded on and continues to follow John Dewey’s principles and the original classroom blocks were designed by him. They look rather like NZ 1950’s blocks but with better verandahs and opening french doors where we have push out windows.


Facilities are not flash as the University is unwilling to put more funding into them. Relationships between teacher unions, the Charter school staff and university can be challenging. Charter schools get less funding than state schools, so although this school has very bright learners, the school is not well off. For all this, by following John Dewey’s methods, they get the highest scores in the state once the kids get to Y10. A bit like our kura, the teaching method does not lend itself to good scores in the junior classes, but if everyone holds their nerve and keeps with the programme, it all “comes right” or better than right by Y10. Interesting support for an excellent liberal arts programme. The maths we saw was organised around clever questioning and looked like what the NZ Numeracy Project hoped to achieve but never quite managed. Gotta say though, we only saw it and heard it from Maths Specialists, -so maybe the Herald , supported by Stuart McNaughton during the week, was right!
Lab School preschool.jpg

This is a private K-12 school which is like St Kentigern on steroids.
We went there to see their Maker Space. It is a 4 story purposed designed $20M Maker Space
IMAG0291.jpg
The ground floor is pure Maker Space meets hard materials meets Auckland Uni Product Accelerator.
It has laser cutters, fabricators, every kind of big expensive doohicky imaginable. Imagine a school with a water powered steel cutter.


Not a place I would go and boast about our 2 tiny 3D printers!


About 150 kids a week go through this building in class sizes of about 15 with 2 teachers around all the time.


Amazing.


The second floor was a space aged Library which also contains the archives.
The Library seating left the Koru Lounge for dead!


IMAG0301.jpgAnd then we visited Tusitala (our Pt England name for the meeting space)…. Wow. The woman in the picture is the equivalent of our Donna. Her full time job is to look after visitors to the school? -No. To just this building. She’s happy because the Tusitala furniture is all on wheels so it’s easy for her to re-configure.
There is a chef who looks after the commestibles.




IMAG0305.jpgThe TV trolleys in their Tusitala will give Garth Screen & Trolley Envy. A bit hard to tell from the pic how large they are. Let’s just settle for enormous.


The 3rd floor is where you take the robots you’ve built to battle it out and has break rooms and lots of space to do things with the things you’ve made.


The 4th floor is robotics central and also has the most amazing hydroponic roof gardens for their garden to table project.

IMAG0312.jpg

This was our final visit in Hawai’i. We went back to our apartment, packed our bags and headed for Paris via LA. We made heaps of new education friends, re-connected with existing ones, got some really challenging ideas and were able to offer help and connections to some who could benefit from this.
IMAG0288.jpg
We feel greatly blessed by this experience.


Some immediate conclusions or thoughts
Having watched the way some our kids ‘lifted their heads’ during Fiafia, and seeing some schools in Hawai’i really focusing on cultural integration, it has me thinking hard about what we could do at home. They are doing it against difficulty and of necessity to regain what has been lost. We could do it easily by including older people from our community.
I like the way they are using gardens for so much more than gardening or growing food. I like the ‘cultural makerspace’ idea and wonder how you could integrate this with a modern makerspace.
I loved the waka training and began dreaming of foundation funding for a Manaiakalani waka to be stored in a shed @ Pt England next to the Caretaker’s shed, a wider gate in the fence, and the council providing us with a grassy swale down to the beach. Add a Quad to tow it with, a chase boat to keep it safe and we’d be in business. We already own the life jackets. I wonder if the Woolf Fisher Trust would be interested? After all they supplied a white man’s boat to the city of Auckland!

Tuesday, 5 July 2016

The Problem with Predictive Search

I want to say right at the beginning of this post, that our partnership with Google is extremely valuable and that they have been invariably helpful and generous toward us.
I also want to say that this is not just a Google problem. This seems to be a problem with algorithms that support predictive search. They’re an unintended result of people trying to make our internet searching for service, content and information faster and more successful.
I also need to tell you that when I brought this matter to attention of Google, I got a same day response along with the promise to try and see what was going wrong and to “fix the issue”.

So where did all this come from?
Last week, my attention was grabbed by the concern that rippled around the world, about the differential in results when one Google searches “3 Black Teenagers v 3 White Teenagers”

As a concerned New Zealand Educator who campaigns for equity, access and success for Maori & Pasifika, I decided to conduct the same test but change the terms. I selected “Maori" as the first term and decided not to use “White” as the second term as it would be likely to return the same result as the viral one, so changed that term to “Pakeha” (the Maori word for White or European)
So... my 1st search was <3 Maori Teenagers>, my 2nd search was <3 Pakeha Teenagers>
I used Google Images as the input medium.

Here are the results:
Maori

Pakeha

I’m very disconcerted by the results of the search.
As the search did with the original terms (White v Black) the return showed mostly less than salutary images of Maori.
Just like the <White> search the <Pakeha> search returned groups of well dressed kids, in this case all in school uniform and in each case, in front of schools. Some of the kids in the <Pakeha> search are in fact Maori and Pasifika, but are portrayed respectful, beautifully dressed and in front of schools as Pakeha.

Here’s what I’m so disconcerted about:
Just like Pakeha, Maori kids go to school. In our country, unlike the US, Maori kids wear uniform just like Pakeha kids.
How is this weird differentiation occurring, that portrays Maori as not wearing uniform, not associated with school, when we work in and love a community where Maori kids go to school and all wear uniform.
The search could even have returned Maori kids in Kapa Haka uniforms, Rugby or Netball uniforms, or doing waka ama.
This is seriously weird.

I’ve been told that Google searches are informed by the typical content interests of the searcher over time.
Not sure if this is the case with Images, but what jangled my nerves even more is that my account <russell@ptengland.school.nz> is associated directly with Pt. England School, where Maori kids wear uniform and go to school! Even more surprising ptengland.school.nz is a Google Apps for Education Domain as is manaiakalani.org. As most of the delightful learners associated with these domains are Maori and Pasifika, one would expect that the predictive search, knowing who I am (and on my phone, where I am) would dish me up some top 10 images that showed me some of what I expected. Unfortunately what the search showed me was what the media dishes up at 6:00 p.m. in its attempt to get ratings.

It appears to be the word <teenager> that dominates the search expectation, as though to be Maori and a teen has an inbuilt negative expectation.

Here is the search result of <Maori Pt England>
it generates a very different picture


I’ve become very interested and concerned about what the juxtaposition of the word <Maori> with the word <Teenager> does.
It seems to do something very wrong

I concluded this informal research by searching Images under the search term <Maori Tamaki College) as Tamaki is our Manaiakalani High School
The return was as I hoped for


Here’s the thing: What you see above are Maori Teenagers!

I know I’ve laboured the point, but I feel it’s important
I have no idea what can be done about it, but I hope something can as I know this is not what Google intends at all and I’m sure it poses a problem for other companies and developers who are refining predictive search as part of what they bring to market place.

Of course, the implications of the issue I've raised here, go far beyond this simple test associating ethnicity with age bracket. This has implications for what we and our learners have presented to us when we search about religion, politics, and contemporary issues to name just a few.

We need to know that along with freedom of speech, we are experiencing freedom of access to information, service and content where the information set is filtered by us not controlled by others.

Thanks for listening/looking
We do still love our partnership with Google!


Sunday, 19 June 2016

The Practice Change Imperative

As I've travelled across jurisdictions and spent time looking at schools and pondering, my conviction that practice is "at the heart of the matter" has solidified and sharpened.

The opportunity to visit multiple schools and learning contexts and to reflect on what is really making a difference, for me, gives rise to two clearly emerging items that we educators have control over:

  • leadership practice
  • teacher practice
There is a 3rd major player in this game and that's family practice. We can work with, guide and influence this 3rd item but we can't control it.
I suggest that the imperative here, is that we get on with the things we can control, whilst we try for best influence with those we can't. Those we can't would have to include politics and policy.

This conclusion about practice is not limited to education, but is equally applicable across the the social service sector.
Preparing an introduction for the Manaiakalani Google Class OnAir presentation to Faculty of Education members of Auckland University was a great opportunity to try and gather my thoughts about this subject that has been bugging me for a while and is at the heart of my own inquiry into practice in the Pt England Learning Community.

I hope you find the setting and the content interesting. Do take the time to visit Class OnAir if you haven't already done so, as it is a completely genuine attempt on the part of some very courageous Manaiakalani Teachers to expose their own developing practice to the whole world. 
Sincere congratulations and kia kaha Class OnAir Teachers, I'm extremely proud of you!




Friday, 6 May 2016

Public Good Partnerships and Collectives of Schools

A Rationale for Public Good Partnerships around Schooling Collectives

New Zealand, in its 26th year of what was known as Tomorrow’s Schools, is the most unusual Education Jurisdiction in the developed world, in that there is no ‘district level’ infrastructure and each school is a Crown Entity answerable to the Minister of Education via the Secretary of Education, ERO and OAG.
Coupled with this, we are blessed to have a national curriculum, (many states do not), but one that gives enormous latitude in its delivery, and in fact commands under the Education Act, that curriculum must be contextualised and approved at a school by school level.
This granularity of delivery gives unequalled opportunity for innovation and light houses or even whole communities of excellence, whilst also enabling profound incoherence, black holes of failure and an absence of understood and mandated practice for success at system level.

This situation needs to be addressed and is acknowledged by government in the Education Act review going on at present, as well as being critiqued and written about by qualified education researchers like Cathie Wylie, John Hattie and Stuart McNaughton.

New Zealand is at a new turning of the ways in respect of the direction education will take to serve the needs of the C21 population, community & economy, and the kind of structures and infrastructures that will deliver it. There are equally critical decisions to be made about its purpose and how we ought to measure its effectiveness against that purpose.

As in other developed jurisdictions there is an observable ‘bipolar disease’ evident in the rhetoric and actions of government, the demands of the commercial establishment and the downward pressure of Universities on the education system:
On the one hand there is powerful rhetoric to be heard on all fronts, from all pundits about C21 skills and dispositions and how important they are in commerce, in industry, in innovation and in the world at large. These are attributes like creativity, curiosity, resilience, ability to collaborate, work in teams, innovate and so on.
On the other hand, the powerful push down and accountability structures are all around knowledge building in defined sets of knowledge related performance. These are things like proficiency in Maths, English and Science and to a large degree, excepting the area of Computer Science, have not changed since the C20.

Developed world economies are all wrestling with this tension, (whether they realise it or not), and are gradually realising that the industrial education system we have brought forward into the C21 is currently unable to deliver what we, corporately, say it should.
In New Zealand, we handle this challenge (badly) by trying to do some of the C21 stuff at primary school, at secondary, (driven by high stakes testing), we talk about it and at University we criticise the schools for preparing the students poorly, and then prepare the graduating teachers even more poorly.

Generally speaking, except in very courageous lighthouse projects, around the developed world, the more successful the community and the better off it is economically, the more conservative the parents and the establishment are, about re-designing school. The conservative, university controlled knowledge building system is all powerful in these neighbourhoods. The families in this broad cohort can be heard to echo “well it worked for us, so it should work for our kids.”

In all developed countries with history of social support, there is strong concern about the “education long tail”. We in NZ, are accustomed to hearing that ours is worse than everyone else’s. In other countries, that’s also what they hear about themselves!
It’s important to consider the long tail, (and ours is bad), in the broader context of essential education re-design that is an urgent global need. It’s pointless trying to fix inequity in outcomes as a thing by itself or as a thing inside a C20 system.

New Zealand, at this turning of the ways, could find itself the recipient of a new state structure mandating top down practice change, that is likely to be driven almost entirely by the C20 knowledge sets and their attendant accountabilities. This is exactly what has happened in the English education system. Jurisdictions making this choice tend to opt for a School District type of delivery structure as it enables the scale, implementation and accountability measures to be pushed from the centre and robustly delivered at the edge.
Alternatively it could adopt what Michael Fullan and Andy Hargreaves, who currently advise our Ministry of Education, call “innovation and development from the middle. Their idea of the middle being; -a collective entity that has its being between the Ministry of Education level and School level. A cluster, a collective, a community of schools, that has the resourcing and power to design, develop and test innovative pedagogies and has sufficient lateral and vertical accountabilities to stay true to a moral purpose, “stay married” and meet the expectations of both crown and community. This is obviously what the NZ Govt is trying out with its $359M IES policy enacted through Communities of Learning that have laterally and vertically agreed ‘Achievement Challenges’

Our experience in Manaiakalani, as the longest running evidence based cluster in NZ is that this idea can be made to work, can enable the development and implementation of innovative pedagogies and can try and address the issues referenced earlier in this paper.
Our finding is that this approach alone is not enough. We needed to become a Public Good Partnership.

New Zealand, like all jurisdictions in the developed world has invested ever increasing amounts in education for little or no change in outcome for its “long tail of underachievement” or the “20%”. The rationale for Public Good Partnerships is based on a fundamental understanding that few if any governments in the developed world will be able to afford the investment required to bring intergenerational change to this cohort which exists in all of our countries and that the growing cost of this cohort over time is detrimental to our economy and our future, quite apart from the serious equity issues that it manifests.

A Public Good Partnership view is also based on the understanding that ‘if Education could fix Education it would have done so quite some time ago’ and that as well as needing a mixed financial resourcing portfolio to support this intensive investment over time, it needs the brains, abilities and understandings of people from other walks of life, to apply their acumen to the challenge we all face. The fundamental conservatism in education is very strong barrier to necessary change. Effective thinkers from outside of education have an enormous contribution to make if they bother to understand the context properly.

As times and global economic understandings have changed we have witnessed a far greater willingness and even eagerness on the part of the commercial, philanthropic, academic and investment sectors to partner in what has hitherto been seen as solely the purview of the state and ‘something we all paid our taxes for’. Manaiakalani is proof positive of the good will of very clever people from many differing backgrounds who want to “make New Zealand a better place” and are prepared to invest in something seen previously as the affair of government and something to steer well clear of.

Manaiakalani, as a Public Good Partnership was founded of necessity because the New Zealand Government via Vote Education, was not able to fund all the activities or the level of intensity required to sustainably raise learner achievement outcomes and effect intergenerational change.

It’s essential, though, that the state remains a strong partner in this process or it’s easy to lose the notion of public good, to say nothing of the the immediate loss of credibility. (Our commercial and philanthropic partners always want to know where government thinking is and where their funding is!) . We do not want the state removed from the design improvement and its attendant responsibilities. The net result would be a more “de-coupled” system in a jurisdiction that already has the most de-coupled education system in the developed world. An outcome of further de-coupling will always be an inability to scale the results of successful development and the continuation of education development as a cottage industry, delivering ‘pockets of promise’ instead of the capability for system change.

A community of schools, in the true sense of the term, is probably the smallest viable unit that should be funded for innovation as this enables the testing of performance over an education pathway from ECE to the completion of Secondary School, and preferably on through post secondary training & employment. Funding individual charter schools for innovation may bless the “cherry” but can never bless the “tree”.
A community of schools is probably the best unit size to keep relational integrity, be a responsive R & D loop, have close accountability to its constituents and to have effective stewarding of relationships with its public good partners. The public good partners are likely to feel benefitted by a close connection with those they benefit.
None of this can possibly be effective unless it is actually a true R & D model. This means research attached to design and implementation is essential. No group should be funded without robust effectiveness requirements.

The unit size of a community of schools is an effective ecology for the teacher practice change imperative that is a requirement of successful C21 pedagogy. New Zealand like other jurisdictions is dogged with poor practice in its social service deliveries. Evidence shows that most typically centre pushed practice change initiatives, delivered via a district structure, fail as they rely on ramped up accountability rather than a practice innovation approach. They also assume that the centre knows what the successful practice will be! Typically the reverse is true and successful practices are found at the edge and cohered in the middle, in collectives and learning networks that are committed to practice improvement.

Communities of schools and collections of communities are able to provide economies of scale for procurement, teacher practice development, R & D, system change development and still remain responsive to their communities, whilst informing the centre of “stuff that works” in our context. This is a vastly preferable scenario, if well managed, to that of purchasing expensive solutions from failing jurisdictions e.g England & the U.S, mandating and pushing them out from the centre, building an ever increasing infrastructure to supervise this, and then wondering why it didn’t work. The recent Herald articles about mathematics in NZ are an excellent example of this kind of thing. We invested massive amounts of money, time and resource over decades in different Mathematics programmes that did not have strong evidence from like contexts, suggesting they would solve the “Long Tail” or inequity problem in maths outcomes. Put bluntly from a decile 1 context, we had little certainty that this would make things better for the Maori & Pasifika people that I live and work amongst.

We are fortunate to be in this business at a time when both the Minister and Associate Minister of Education have publicly called for a more innovative education sector going forward into 2017. An obvious way to foster innovation is to invest in partnerships which produce it, thus enabling a systematic development that is appropriately evaluated and capable of being widely shared or scaled to bring intergenerational change.